Thursday, September 1, 2011

Losing Interest in Self-Interest

I read a post recently by Molly from Women With Drive, in which she explained the unusual feeling she had as a child in passing another car on the highway and realizing that, in that car, was another family with a whole other set of experiences. I've felt that same surreal feeling my entire life whenever I run into someone new. It's hard to explain, but I'll give it my best shot...



I tend to view the world as if I am the center and all other objects in my experience revolve around me. When I meet other people, I add them as an extension of my world. They are stars in my galaxy. Moons in my atmosphere. Clouds in my sky. The world is mine, and they are merely part of it. Yet, when I stop for a moment and attempt to see my world from their eyes, something earth-shattering happens. My throat dries. My heart stops beating. My universe shifts. Because, when I see their eyes looking back me, I realize I am looking into another world. And in this world:
  • I am the star.
  • I am the moon.
  • I am the cloud.
  • I am the extension.
  • I revolve around them.
Suddenly, something occurs to me: I am not as important as I think I am.

Just over two years ago, I graduated college with a degree in Economics. While in school, I consumed popular economics literature like it was candy. Self-interest became my mantra. Adam Smith's "Butcher-Baker-Brewer" hypothesis became the lens through which I saw the world. All of us, I believed, behave in such a way that maximizes our self-interest.  Life is about the pursuit of our own happiness and fulfilling our own desires. Even when we do seemingly selfless things, we only do them because it gives us greater pleasure than failing to do them.

Self-interest is, therefore, a very difficult worldview to discredit. And I am not sure I am even trying to discredit it. Though I do find it rather simplistic given the complexity of human nature, it certainly has its merit. As human beings, we may very well be nothing more than animals fighting over resources in a more civilized manner. It may be true that we are biologically hardwired for self-preservation and that we are biologically incapable of seeing others as ends rather than means. It may be true. BUT I DON'T CARE. It is impractical.

I am losing interest in self-interest. It's an interesting theory to ponder, but it is not a very good way to live. When I meet another person, worlds collide. I am not encountering an object in my world; I am encountering a subject in another world. My world is but a world among and within other worlds. There exist perspectives other than my own. The mere fact that I can recognize this idea as true is a revolt against my self-interested nature. If I am an animal fighting over resources, I can be civilized only by recognizing that the other animals need those resources just as much as I do. I can rise above my biological predispositions by empathetically recognizing others as ends rather than means. I can see the world through another's eyes.

What about you? What crosses your mind when you run into somebody else? Do you think, "What can I get out of this conversation? How does my hair look? How can this relationship work for me?" Or, are you like me? Are you taken aback by the fact that you're running into another world? When you experience this realization, you'll start asking questions like, "What is this person seeking from our conversation? Does this person feel comfortable with his or her appearance? How can this relationship work for this person?"

Give it a try. Step into another's world. You'll be suprised what you might find.

19 comments:

  1. Holy wow, Doug. This is great stuff. Honored that I could in some way provide the impetus. In terms of colliding worlds, I've come to embrace the reality of paradox and symbiosis. For me, disciplining myself to realize Self in the Other has given me the perspective to value us both, because we share duality.

    Pretty woo woo stuff, and I'm not even through with my first cup of coffee. Thanks so much for sharing this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your comment, Molly! I better get another cup of coffee after this talk of duality and paradoxes ;-). Seriously though, I appreciate your continued l insight on Liz's Blog as well as WWD (which I just discovered). I think we can only find true fulfillment for ourselves in others. I'm a HUGE existentialist and believe strongly in the power of individual freedom. At the same time, I recognize that same capacity in others. And those freedoms manifest in others that have inspired me have created the person I am today. It is paradoxical: I am necessarily free and yet inescapably connected to my fellow human beings. Thanks again for the interaction!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I often wonder what roads people travel before and after they interact with me. Social networking has made that more transparent. But I too have often thought about that, esp as a child in the backseat of my parents car on a rainy Saturday. I too am an Econ major. ENTP by any chance? #doppelganger

    ReplyDelete
  4. Stan, thank you so much for your comment. I am crazy about social meda! It's the perfect platform for both self-expression and interaction with others. And, despite my slight revolt in this post against neo-classical economic theory, I am a huge fan of economics education. Learning about values and incentives in human interaction has helped me mote than anything. Economics, to me, has always been about relationships rather than numbers. It's not, as Thomas Carlyle said, "a dismal science" but rather, as Diane Coyle says, a "soulful science,"

    I am facinsted by M-B typology theory and have taken tests both indicating I am an ENTP and an ENFP. I think that, form the former, I read an academic article the night before and, for the latter, I watched a chick flick with my wife the night before. LOL!

    Thanks for interacting, and I look forward to getting to know you better.

    ReplyDelete
  5. OK now you are scaring me. I think if we ever meet Laws of Nature will collapse on themselves. #wavingArmsInOddPatternsToSeeIfItsAReflection

    ReplyDelete
  6. OK now you are scaring me. I think if we ever meet Laws of Nature will collapse on themselves. #wavingArmsInOddPatternsToSeeIfItsAReflection

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ha! Who knows, buddy? A trip to DC is definitely on the horizon!

    ReplyDelete
  8. What a great post, Doug. I will have to thank my friend for turning me on to it. Your insight reminds me of something that was passed on to me years ago, and prompted me for the first time to the insight you just shared. It's from Leo Buscaglia's book "Loving Each Other."

    "We will only begin to forgive when we can look upon the wrongdoers as ourselves, neither better or worse. We need to remember that we coexist as mortals in the world, together, the wronged and wrongdoer, and that in our common humanity, the situation could be readily reversed. We divide the world into the good and the bad and see ourselves as being on the good side, distancing us from the other. Yet, it is only in identifying with the other that the processes of understanding and forgiveness can begin."

    Humbling.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you for comment, Mary. I have not heard of that author but that is a beautiful passage. Forgiveness is a powerful thing. To forgive is inert to embrace our humanity because it demonstrates an empathetic posture. How incredible it is to be able to feel sympatheic rather than vindictive when someone wrongs you! It's as if, instead of saying, "you have hurt me," you're saying, "how terrible you must feel to harmed a fellow human being." We truly are, as individuals, parts of a whole. If we cut off our nose, we spite our face.

    Thanks again for your thoughtful reaction and I apologize if none of the above made sense. It's late and that was off the top of my head. LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Thank you for comment, Mary. I have not heard of that author but that is a beautiful passage. Forgiveness is a powerful thing. To forgive is inert to embrace our humanity because it demonstrates an empathetic posture. How incredible it is to be able to feel sympatheic rather than vindictive when someone wrongs you! It's as if, instead of saying, "you have hurt me," you're saying, "how terrible you must feel to harmed a fellow human being." We truly are, as individuals, parts of a whole. If we cut off our nose, we spite our face.

    Thanks again for your thoughtful reaction and I apologize if none of the above made sense. It's late and that was off the top of my head. LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Doug,
    It's a fantastic question that has many dimensions of importance, including spiritual. A couple years ago I attended a workshop where the facilitator posed a question that rocked my world. It lines up with what you write here: Who am I being so that others around me realize how great they are? It's become central to my work, my spiritual journey, coaching, teaching...everything.

    How fantastic, Doug, that you've shared this inquiry with us.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thank you for comment, Mary. I have not heard of that author but that is a beautiful passage. Forgiveness is a powerful thing. To forgive is inert to embrace our humanity because it demonstrates an empathetic posture. How incredible it is to be able to feel sympatheic rather than vindictive when someone wrongs you! It's as if, instead of saying, "you have hurt me," you're saying, "how terrible you must feel to harmed a fellow human being." We truly are, as individuals, parts of a whole. If we cut off our nose, we spite our face.

    Thanks again for your thoughtful reaction and I apologize if none of the above made sense. It's late and that was off the top of my head. LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Shawn, you are absolutely right. It IS a spiritual question. I come from a Christian background and is Jesus himself who said, "Do to others as you would have them do to you." There is mo greater principle to follow, for your business or for your soul. Scott Ginsberg says, "It's not how people experience YOU; it's how people experience THEMSELVES in relation to you."

    Thank you for your thoughtful comment, Shawn, and I'm excited to be a part of the 12 Most community with you

    ReplyDelete
  14. Love it, going deeper, it's my passion and message with readers and clients. A great red velvet rope for sure. When they are ready like Shawn said below they will "line up" and it becomes central to your work.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Thank you so much for your comment, Michelle! To me, business is EXTREMELY personal; it isn't just about earning a paycheck. It's about making a difference in people's lives. I do think it's important to provide my own needs and give myself incentive to be remarkable but, at the end of the day, it's about others. If, at the end of my life, I have given less than I have received, then I have lived in vain. I forget who said it but this is the motto I live by: I'm not in business to make money; I make money to be in business."

    ReplyDelete
  16. Good post, thanks. "I am not as important as I think I am." has 3 "I's" as in ironic. Perhaps we are all too hard on ourselves (Even 'beating ourselves up' comes from a sense of over importance). There is no fault in a rose that is only in half bloom; it is as it should be. The harder I am on myself, the harder it is to be kind to others. Like you - I've been a fan of what is called 'self-help' for a long time. I have come to realize that too often- it often does little more than have us isolate and criticize ourselves which widens the very chasm we are trying to navigate. It often seems our culture worships a type of 'built in disatisfaction' that tells us 'enough is never enough' (and not just materially but in all aspects of life). Critics might say without that 'dissatifaction' we are not driven to improve. Others might say that giving up that 'drive', that incessant dissatifaction - IS an improvement. It is as though we want to be 'awesome' but not allow ourselves to be awed.
    If we had everything in the world we ever wanted, our very next thought would be 'how do I keep from losing it?"
    Our lives are shaped by the ideas we choose to give it meaning, so what will we choose?
    I would like to leave a final thought. When any of us really hurts with pain, loneliness, or loss and someone comes up to us to hand us a (proverbial) warm-fuzzy kitten and says, "Just stay positive and it will be alright." - I think we have the right to punch them! ( a figure of speech of course ). If any of this strikes a chord, I give away my ebook that expands on these thoughts (no religion, no sales gimmicks, just honest words) http://www.WriteThisDown.com It is called "When Life Isn't Fair..." Regards to all - Don Thank you for allowing me this post, Doug.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Wow, Don, thank you for your thoughtful comment! I must say that none of this was intended as self-deprecation. Someone has said it a lot more eloquently than I'm about to, but, "true humility is not considering yourself, 'bad.' It's simply not considering yourself at all." Self-deprecation is latent self-centeredness. To be a true asset to others, you've got to become so comfortable in your own skin that your ego is merely an afterthought.

    I've got to admit that I'm all about self-improvement. Dissatisfaction drives me. But it isn't a psychologically unhealthy, emotionally damaging dissatisfaction. It's a recognition that "who I am" is in constant flux. I'm always changing and I want to change for the better. I would never beat myself up, but nor would I let myself fall back on excuses. It's all about forward motion. Getting better. Regret is an obstacle to provement. Self-pity is a hindrance. Those who truly want to improve have got to build up an immunity to self-destructive notions of failure and self-deprecation.

    Again, thank you for commenting. It's always flattering when someone takes a moment from his or her day to respond to something I've said. I'll be happy to check out your site and thank you for passing the link along to me.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I love that quote you gave, "Self-depreciation is latent self-centeredness." Genius! thanks for that. There is a giant door that is made of coral just outside Miami called the 'Coral Castle', an old tourist attraction. This giant door weights almost 20,000 pounds- yet can be open and closed with light pressure from only two fingers because it is balanced perfectly without friction on its hinges. In balance there is power. There can also be usefulness from what is ‘not there’.


    BALANCE

    Thirty spokes unite at the wheels hub;
    It is the center hole that makes it useful.

    Shape clay into a vessel;
    It is the space within that makes it useful.

    Cut out doors and windows for a room;
    It is the holes which make it useful.

    Therefore profit comes from what is there;
    Usefulness from what is not there.

    Lao-Tze
    This is also in my free ebook http://www.WriteThisDown.com

    ReplyDelete
  19. Thanks again for your insightful thoughts, Don. I downloaded your eBook and am excited to add it to my reading list!

    ReplyDelete